Yes, there have been a few women leading wars as well, but they have too always been within patriarchal societies, with male violence, male justifications and taught that violence is the way. Just as women internalize misogyny, we are also taught that violence is important and even needed. We have been taught that war is needed and necessary, because that’s how the world is constructed.
The reasoning stops there, nobody asks why the world is constructed like so, nobody questions it. Because, again, non-violence in a patriarchal world is impossible and unthinkable.
White women need to listen to WOC.
No woman is “cis” and no woman is privileged over transwomen on the axis of sex/gender, quite the opposite. Transwomen need to listen to women when it comes to feminism, not the other way around.
Both WOC and transwomen need their own spaces, although transwomen are notoriously bad at doing this and instead co-opts women’s spaces, against the women’s wishes.
By dismantling patriarchy and male power, hence dismantling male violence, the cause of armies and war. There can be no peace while patriarchy is still functioning. We are so used to male violence and their wars through millenia that not living in a world of violence is deemed unthinkable and unrealistic.
Attack/invasion by which army if there are no armies?
How about stop letting men attack/invade other people, be it personally or large-scale armies. The mere concept of armies is so violent and disgusting.
Nah, those are the same dolphins. Hot radfem dolphins flipping their shit because male dolphins are actually douchebags (google it, it’s almost funny you took them as an example).
Also can all animal lovers here stop comparing humans to cats and dolphins? They’re completely irrelevant to humans. Compare us to bonobos, they’re the species most like us in brain structure.
jfc we have never said PIV is unnatural. Obviously it exists so that we can reproduce - nothing else. How often does cats have PIV sex, hmm? Humans are one of the extremely few species (presumably; that could be a social construct too) who don’t have heat cycles. To put it in perspective, because you complete imbecils always need a written-out example to understand anything: maybe it’s “natural” for a heterosexual to engage in PIV like once every ten years for reproduction; the rest of the time they have other forms of sex. FOR EXAMPLE.
What we are saying is: PIV in todays society is:
• falsely seen as The Sex Act above all other sex acts (despite other sex acts being more enjoyable for women). this is for the benefit of men and the subjugation of women.
• used as a weapon against women
• naturally have only existed for reproductive purposes, and really, do we need more people in an already massively overpopulated earth? i’m fairly certain that the PIV norm has contributed to the world over population.
The reason you’re not getting a response is located in the Read me page that you should’ve read before asking. I don’t even know that guy but oh my fucking god that is the most obnoxious statement. A male being the father of modern feminism, right. How about hell no. No, men cannot be feminists and certainly not “fathers of feminism”.
Why would trans women and gnc women be lumped together? Gnc women are biological females who were born and raised women. They belong in womens safe spaces.
Trans women can make whatever spaces they want for themselves as long as it doesn’t hurt females. I’m happy to support a trans women only shelter, for example.
Nobody should be forced into the army, neither men nor women. Radical feminism is against even the notion of armies, as they are tools for male dominance.
Again: this is Ask a Radfem, not Debate a Radfem. and we don’t give personal advice. okay? okay.
Well, imo it’s not fashion (or clothing) that’s wrong, it’s the industry based on impossible beauty standards for women. Post-patriarchy people would probably still want to dress nicely, because people like to look at beautiful garments etc. and I doubt that would change much (humans are like magpies). Or maybe it would, and our appreciation for beauty is only socially constructed - who knows!
Still, there are subcultural fashion that exploit women to a much lesser degree than mainstream fashion or other subcultures. I think it’s possible to be subversive in your clothing style (women wearing stereotypically masculine clothing, or men stereotypically feminine etc.) and with that actually make a feminist statement.
Read the FAQ. We don’t give personal advice.
You’re an uneducated idiot who I have no time or interest in.
I’m sure you do plenty if you need to ask this question.
Trauma is not fucking INTERESTING to the victim, what the hell is wrong with you?! If someone, I dunno, stabbed you in the throat and I came to visit you at the hospital and said “what happened to you was very INTERESTING, I’m so FASCINATED by the horrible incident that scarred you for life”, would you think that was a normal response?!